quote:
quote:
I could see it making sense from the Lakers perspective, cavs not so much, they are up 2-1 on a good Magic team, and almost won fifty games in regular season, why would they give up a good young player, for a 40 year old who walked out on you twice, and if LeBron can't win with the Lakers roster, he is really not going to like that cavs roster without spida

Because Mitchell has 1 year left on his contract and basically 0 chance of returning to Cleveland.

Mitchell has one year left on contract so trade for a 40 year old who doesnt play defense and is injury prone, who is also only going to be there for one year? Cavs would be better off trading Mitchell for picks and a role player who is under the age of thirty

quote:
Also, the CLE roster is much better than the Lakers roster IMO.

Ad is a top 75 player, there is no other team LeBron can realistically go to and get more help than he has now

1 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by shel311

McKinney, Texas

Member since Aug 2004

111690 posts

Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:59 pm to bobBoxer

quote:
Ad is a top 75 player, there is no other team LeBron can realistically go to and get more help than he has now

No chance

3 through 12, the Lakers are one of the worst teams in the NBA. That matters.

Lebron and AD are at worst, 2 top 20 players. They were a play in team. That tells you that you have to have a little something past your top 2 players.

They are a really poorly constructed team. Swapping Lebron for Mitchell, this Cavs team would be better than this Lakers team, I don't think it's terribly close.

2 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Pelicans Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board