- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would someone please explain the crimes Trump committed?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:25 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The wacky NY records law has an expansive view of fraudulent business records, and the allegation is that the obfuscations I posted above was fraud, per the statute.
Some of the legal experts on the cable news keep stating that the prosecution failed to specify "an election crime or a valid theory of fraud."
What do they mean by this? Do you know which NY statute Bragg is prosecuting?
The quote cited is from Boston University law professor Jed Handelsman Shugerman.
1
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:42 am to jrodLSUke
quote:
What do they mean by this? Do you know which NY statute Bragg is prosecuting?
IIRC, that's the hook to get around the SOL issue.
Even if the jury finds that this behavior violates the wacky business records law, they have to rely on a second statute with a longer SOL, which requires the campaign association.
The meat is the business records part.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News