- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I know people have varying thoughts on PFF, but they had Fuaga as the 2nd best OT and....
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:38 am to Damone
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:38 am to Damone
quote:
They also had two available DBs and two DL ranked ahead of Fuaga
Who fricking cares? If he’s a good OT, then the pick was a successful one. Drafting is not an exact science and so it is very frivolous and nonsensical to argue the difference between a guy you think should have gone at 14 and a guy you think should have gone at 18.
How do people not get this? If drafting was an exact science, Mel Kiper and Todd McShay wouldn’t whiff on as many picks as they do, and half of the 1st round picks wouldn’t turn out to be busts every year.
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News