re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.

quote:

---

It is very likely that there will be an immunity from criminal prosecution for official Acts. The issue is that what Trump is accused of doing is almost certainly not an official act so if they give immunity for official acts he's still in the box

---

During the argument the justices were asking the DOJ who makes the determination between private and official acts? The DOJ responded that the president needs to seek legal counsel from the DOJ to make that determination. I got the impression that the justices did not buy that argument. But if they do, why does only the DOJ become the official arbiter to decide private and official acts? What about any other legal counsel? Because President Trump sought legal counsel from John Eastman and a couple of other WH lawyers to challenge aspects of the 2020 election.