- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: VW Chattanooga Workers Expand Mexican Economic Growth
Posted on 4/21/24 at 3:44 pm to BigBinBR
Posted on 4/21/24 at 3:44 pm to BigBinBR
quote:
Chattanooga is VW’s only plant in the US.
Then VW could close it, even if they closed the plant because of the union vote. The "no partial closures" rule is designed to prevent an employer shutting down one plant because it voted for a union as it would create a chilling effect on the other plant or plants. In the last five years, the NLRB order a plant reopened because of a partial closing (one plant closed, one plant open). The order to reopen was rescinded because it was unduly burdensome (the delay of appeals helped the employer).
The link below explains how it works. I'm not sure why I'm getting downvotes - I've practiced in labor law for 30 years + and have litigated numerous ULP cases, including some involving closures.
Case on Plant Closures Discussed
Posted on 4/21/24 at 3:50 pm to chinhoyang
quote:
The order to reopen was rescinded because it was unduly burdensome (the delay of appeals helped the employer).
Yeah it was rescinded because the DC court of appeal sent it back to them to take another look at it. They basically said “We looked at it again and they should still have to reopen, but we won’t force them.” They were worried about getting a SCOTUS decision that would have cut their power so they decided not to force the issue.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)