- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Supreme Court Appears Skeptical of Using Obstruction Law to Charge Jan. 6 Rioters
Posted on 4/16/24 at 12:10 pm to WPBTiger
Posted on 4/16/24 at 12:10 pm to WPBTiger
5-4 seems the minimum on the questions asked during the arguments, maybe 6-3. Best case 7-2 with how two of the liberal justices seemed to have various issues with the broad overreach of the sub-statute...
Regardless it seems that it didn't go that well for the government case in oral arguements
It was more interesting when I think Alito or Gorsuch asked if what constitutes interrupting an official proceeding and if that includes pulling a fire alarm during a vote...
Regardless it seems that it didn't go that well for the government case in oral arguements
It was more interesting when I think Alito or Gorsuch asked if what constitutes interrupting an official proceeding and if that includes pulling a fire alarm during a vote...
This post was edited on 4/16/24 at 12:13 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News