Started By
Message

re: Judge Meghan orders National Enquirer stories admitted as evidence

Posted on 4/16/24 at 8:42 am to
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
18099 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 8:42 am to
quote:

I mean, there’s not much difference between NE and New York Times or Washington Post, so I guess I get it.


Are you sure? I think the Enquirer has a much cleaner track record when it comes to court cases.
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
7644 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Are you sure? I think the Enquirer has a much cleaner track record when it comes to court cases.



Well when your business model was printing salacious content on supermarket checkout lines for last minute purchases, you know a thing or 2 about getting sued. It is all baked into the business model. Sell a bunch of papers and settle for less than the profit and apologize.

Meanwhile other news media will do the same and believe their excrement doesn’t stink, and freak out when they get sued, and make statements standing by their story and delaying the case until the plaintiff drops the case because the cost out weighs the reward or settlement unless it is a big player or conservative media like Fox News with deep pockets.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram