Yeah, that's what I thought. You've never entered onto a contractual agreement, so you have no clue what you're talking about. This is just a theoretical topic for you. That also makes you a liar for misrepresenting yourself. I regret wasting time trying to have an honest discussion with you. Feel free to have the last word.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by cwill

Member since Jan 2005

54753 posts

Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:13 pm to L.A.

Here we go boys...the ole google machine comes through again, the terms of a Seattle Times advert contract, in pertinent part:

quote:
e) The position, subject matter, form, size, wording, illustrations and typography of all advertising is subject to The Seattle Times Company approval. The Seattle Times Company reserves the right to reposition, classify, edit, reject or cancel any advertisement at any time, before or after insertion. Any specific page or position requests must be contracted in writing. Position is not guaranteed outside of position specific advertising.

quote:
h) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN THIS PARAGRAPH, NEITHER THE SEATTLE TIMES COMPANY NOR THE OPERATOR OF PARTNER SITE(S) WILL BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES RESULTING FROM ERRORS IN, OR FAILURE TO PUBLISH ADVERTISING, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, GENERAL, PRESUMED OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES OR LOST PROFITS. THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY OF THE ADVERTISER FOR ANY ERROR IN, OR NON-PUBLICATION OF, AN AD SHALL BE LIMITED TO A PRO RATE CREDIT FOR SUCH ADVERTISING, PROVIDED THAT THE ADVERTISER HAS PAID FOR THE AD CONTAINING ERROR OR WHICH WAS NOT PUBLISHED. If the Seattle Times Company is unable to cause the operator of the site(s) to provide advertising on the schedule set forth in the insertion order because of Advertiser or its Agency’s act of omission, The Seattle Times Company and operator of its partner sites shall be entitled to full payment of all charges for such advertising. No allowance other than herein specified shall be made for imperfect display or omission of key information.

LINK

There's what some employee says and then there's what the published contract says.

This post was edited on 4/10/24 at 12:16 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by DisplacedBuckeye

Member since Dec 2013

73080 posts

Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:14 pm to L.A.

quote:
Yeah, that's what I thought. You've never entered onto a contractual agreement, so you have no clue what you're talking about. This is just a theoretical topic for you. That also makes you a liar for misrepresenting yourself. I regret wasting time trying to have an honest discussion with you. Feel free to have the last word.

I made you look foolish, and you're having an emotional reaction.

If you knew half of what you claim to know, you wouldn't be running your mouth about a lawsuit without even seeing the contract.