Started By
Message

re: Seattle pastor claims newspaper canceled church's Easter service ad after CEO objected

Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:50 am to
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
73414 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:50 am to
quote:

You seem to be trying to limit this to A said they would do XYZ, and B said they would pay for A to do XYZ.

Most contracts have termination conditions. That this may have been unprecedented is entirely irrelevant.
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61453 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 11:55 am to
Yeah, that's what I thought. You've never entered onto a contractual agreement, so you have no clue what you're talking about. This is just a theoretical topic for you. That also makes you a liar for misrepresenting yourself. I regret wasting time trying to have an honest discussion with you. Feel free to have the last word.
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
5636 posts
Posted on 4/10/24 at 12:02 pm to
There are words in the article that make it sound like the parties had a contract:
quote:

The ad's original messaging mentioning "Hell" and "revival" was altered after it was rejected by the paper, but a modified version of the ad was finally accepted and paid for on March 19, the emails reportedly showed.

However, Johnson said the contract was canceled the following day, just two days before the ad was to be published.

He claimed the marketing team told him that "the owner [Frank Blethen] personally stepped in today and canceled your ad." He was told the prominent religious ad would hurt the company's reputation.
When you see words like "accepted," "paid for," and "canceled," it sounds like there was a contract.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram