re: Hailey Van Lith says negative LSU comments fueled by racism

quote:

---

It is funny seeing TD pretty much agree with HVL though. If this exact situation was happening to South Carolina and they were crying racism about it, this board would definitely not agree

---

Everything the same except South Carolina playing UCLA the article wouldn’t have been written or at least not negative, so I guess racism is involved with that differing standard.

The most negative comments were the reference to porn that mostly had white women actresses as debutants and anything about the coach. Debutants are viewed as being outdated, sexist, elitist, and likely racist (as everything is) by the left and a negative to them even before the porn reference. Calling a southern women a dirty debutants is probably some inside joke amongst the elite. I am pretty sure the bigger aim of the article was to label Kim, LSU, and Louisiana in general as backwards southern homophobic trash with the team reflecting the trashiness of its coach on the court. Part of divisive politics practiced by the left under the guise of tolerance, inclusion, and diversity.

The Angel versus the UCLA player was just homer crap, and to call that racist is a joke. Being hard on the most recognizable and vocal player on the opposing team isn’t racist.

Continuing to compare her criticism last year against Clark’s is also weak. Angel got called out more the last game against Iowa because she chased down the player after the game was over to taunt her while she should have been celebrating the championship her team just won. It wasn’t a good look, and I am sure she wasn’t quiet during the game. If she had quit at the buzzer nothing would have been said. It’s not a double standard when it’s different.