- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LA Supreme Court just struck down law expanding time to file suit against molesters
Posted on 3/22/24 at 4:39 pm to TBoy
Posted on 3/22/24 at 4:39 pm to TBoy
Look, I think child molesters should just be summarily shot by family members, but civil claims have to prescribe. There are huge problems with subjecting a civil defendant to suit with only a preponderance burden of proof after 30, 40, 50 years.
If the legislature feels this strongly about it, then eliminate prescription for the criminal charge just like we do for murder. Beyond a reasonable doubt should be the standard after that length of time.
ETA: the criminal charge for first degree rape never prescribes and the criminal charge for molestation of a minor prescribes 30 years after 18th birthday of the victim. So change that if you want. I have never practiced one second of criminal law in my life.
If the legislature feels this strongly about it, then eliminate prescription for the criminal charge just like we do for murder. Beyond a reasonable doubt should be the standard after that length of time.
ETA: the criminal charge for first degree rape never prescribes and the criminal charge for molestation of a minor prescribes 30 years after 18th birthday of the victim. So change that if you want. I have never practiced one second of criminal law in my life.
This post was edited on 3/22/24 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 3/22/24 at 4:43 pm to Tigerlaff
I don't have a problem with this. The same needs to happen for women that claim they were raped 20 years ago.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 4:46 pm to Tigerlaff
Couldn’t agree more with you on this. This is about trial lawyers getting a shot at big money judgments not about justice for the victims.
Posted on 3/22/24 at 6:55 pm to Tigerlaff
I don't care if they make certain claims never prescribe. The issue I had was taking a claim which already prescribed and subsequently changing the prescriptive period and letting it proceed. And the prescriptive period really isnt unreasonable. It's by the age 28. 10 years into adulthood.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)