Started By
Message

re: COVID Lab Leak Theory Resurfaces After Controversial New Study

Posted on 3/17/24 at 11:36 pm to
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
6550 posts
Posted on 3/17/24 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

probably zoonotic until there's good reason not to


A biolab in the same town that works on that sort of virus? Or a random tree rat who no-one has gotten such a disease from in modern history? I get where you're coming from, but I'm too skeptical to even buy into it at a provisional theory that goes against (I don't write journals, so I'm sure I'm not using the right terms,) logic and probability. Thousands of wet markets in China, but it happened in the place they have a lab. Koinky-dink?

Let's discount that until a government that will never give us enough evidence to prove that. I guess we're done here

Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
9912 posts
Posted on 3/17/24 at 11:44 pm to
I agree. It's a reasonable controversy because there are plausible competing explanations. Where the relevant experts differ from the online baw, though, is their priors are strongly on the side of spillovers because they've seen it a thousand times and there has never in the history of the world been a proven iatrogenic pandemic. Plus, the published literature looks more over time like a spillover. The availability heuristic makes conspiracy SO JUICY THO once the layman learns of a virology lab across town. People get puzzled when they see a story like this claim the "lab leak theory resurfaces" like "WHAT DO YOU MEAN RESURFACES IT WAS NEVER GONE". That's because it's the dominant theory among the public, but it's a minority opinion among experts, although it's not really dead there either.
This post was edited on 3/17/24 at 11:55 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram