Started By
Message

re: Presidents should be allowed to serve more than 2 terms, so long as only 2 are consecutive

Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:18 pm to
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
7628 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

I think one 5 year term is enough. If you can’t get things done in 5 years you don’t need more time


Maybe we need a rule like the British Prime Minister. Except that there are 4 year max terms. Once a year, Congress can have a vote of No Confidence in the current President and calling for a new election and a new 4 year term. The only caveat is that the President has to run in the fall with a 6-9 month election process of party primaries. The sitting President can run for that election provided he has not served more than 5 years previously since the presidential term resets every No Confidence Vote or 4 years.
This post was edited on 3/11/24 at 6:20 pm
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
6562 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

Maybe we need a rule like the British Prime Minister. Except that there are 4 year max terms. Once a year, Congress can have a vote of No Confidence


You have to explain what you're trying to accomplish. The PM system in UKI has produced little good since Thatcher. Sunak is a Tory? lol.

I'm not an advocate for the Chinese 400 year horizon when it comes to politics, but ooh boy, we're not good. This speaks to US Navy construction, in the foremost of my mind. The Navy keeps us as rocking as we can, like the British Fleet kept England alive for centuries. Roll out a hundred destroyers in five years. Send them everywhere.

AEGIS and naval artillery fix almost anything, if you have enough. Let's have enough.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram