- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Apple Or Android? May The Battle Continue.
Posted on 4/6/24 at 1:55 am to Fat Batman
Posted on 4/6/24 at 1:55 am to Fat Batman
quote:
Switching costs can be monetary, psychological, effort-based, and time-based.
4. Social stigma can be a psycological switching cost for apple users moving to a competitor.
5. The social stigma does not come from apple creating a better messaging experience solely on merit. It comes from excluding iphone users from messaging non-iphone users in a secure and modern fashion.
Dude, I don't want to get into this back and forth back forth again so I'm just say this and leave it be for now. What you don;t get is that this is just sound babble the leftist DOJ is making up to give Biden one more thing to tout about. This is not a legal basis for suing a company and is one hell of a slippery slope to start going down. We're gonna start going after companies in highly competitive markets because they may socially impact minorities?
Anyway, I can't wait for Apple to substantively respond. Will be quite interesting to see how leftist company like Apple handles this leftist nonsense.
This post was edited on 4/6/24 at 2:16 am
Posted on 4/6/24 at 11:00 am to TigerGman
quote:
Anyway, I can't wait for Apple to substantively respond. Will be quite interesting to see how leftist company like Apple handles this leftist nonsense.
i don't think they necessarily have to. even if they do it will be more meaningless spin on how they're acting in the users' best interest despite openly wanting to maintain a bare minimum experience for users in the interests of their bottom line:
quote:
“In looking at it with hindsight, I think going forward we need to set a stake in the ground for what features we think are ‘good enough’ for the consumer. I would argue we’re already doing *more* than what would have been good enough. But we find it very hard to regress our product features YOY [year over year].” Existing features “would have been good enough today if we hadn’t introduced [them] already,” and “anything new and especially expensive needs to be rigorously challenged before it’s allowed into the consumer phone.”
they'll probably just end up settling the case to some lesser degree like the tech giants before them in the many similar cases already played out under various political regimes.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News