- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: “Pretty in Pink” was released today in ‘86. John Hughes finest work
Posted on 2/28/24 at 5:33 pm to Dam Guide
Posted on 2/28/24 at 5:33 pm to Dam Guide
quote:
Downey Jr or Michael J Fox
Seems to me that of the 2, RD Jr would have been the better fit. I mean, his Back to School character (Derek) was a tad on the odd side.
1
Posted on 2/28/24 at 9:43 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Seems to me that of the 2, RD Jr would have been the better fit. I mean, his Back to School character (Derek) was a tad on the odd side.
That’s who they really wanted, it would have been a much different movie.
quote:
Because teenage girls want the cool guy and most girls want the rich guy. Its hardwired hunter-gatherer DNA...the question women ask: who's gonna be man enough to take care of me? Duckie is no hunter. Plus Duckie was screwed from the get go. He was in the friend zone, serving 18 to life, and that's a female maximum security prison even Andy Dufresne couldn't escape from.
Robert Downey Jr or Michael J Fox was supposed to be Duckie in the original script though. So it wasn’t supposed to be someone like Cryer. They had to change the story to fit Cryer as Duckie.
This post was edited on 2/28/24 at 9:46 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News