- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Qualified Immunity for Concealed Permit Holders?
Posted on 2/21/24 at 12:42 pm to ValhallaAwaits
Posted on 2/21/24 at 12:42 pm to ValhallaAwaits
quote:
LEOs are held responsible for their CRIMINAL acts. QI protects LEO from being hung out to dry for doing their lawful duties.
While technically true, guess who determines what "lawful duty" means?
The larger problem is that while it doesn't protect them from criminal (as they see it) acts, it does protect them from mistakes, negligence, etc etc etc.
1
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:10 pm to Flats
quote:
The larger problem is that while it doesn't protect them from criminal (as they see it) acts, it does protect them from mistakes, negligence, etc etc etc.
It protects them from mistakes, yes, not negligence but only if those mistakes aren’t clearly defined in previously established rules/case law. That’s how QI works.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News