- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: One of our departed posters assured me that all Lawyers were certainly smarter
Posted on 2/16/24 at 10:23 am to AlxTgr
Posted on 2/16/24 at 10:23 am to AlxTgr
quote:
Post judgment, plaintiff gets assignment of rights from defendant and sues both the insurer and the law firm. The law firm. This is not a failure to settle case, as there was never a chance to settle the case against the driver.
This is why Rule 11 exists (it will be removable to federal court).
2
Posted on 2/16/24 at 10:29 am to udtiger
quote:I do not play in that sand box, so I have to ask, how will that work?
it will be removable to federal court
Posted on 2/16/24 at 2:27 pm to udtiger
quote:
and the law firm
Insurer had the duty protect the insured from an excess. Surely the lawyer would be peppering the file with letters. Possibly even advising the insured to get independent counsel.
It’s not malpractice if you advise your client properly and they still get trounced. It’s rarely malpractice if you advise them at all and still get trounced.
But now I’m sorry I missed the facts before the edit. Sounds interesting.
This post was edited on 2/16/24 at 2:32 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News