Started By
Message

re: They are afraid of the Tucker interview with Putin

Posted on 2/7/24 at 7:32 pm to
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23147 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

That a gargantuan military alliance abutting Russia's entire western border was not a threat to Russia.


Yes, there was a huge risk that NATO was going to attack Russia lol
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
72041 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 7:36 pm to
If another country put weapons on our border you wouldn’t be okay with it. NATO & Ukraine FAFOd
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64520 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 7:36 pm to
The Warsaw pack in Mexico. Russian Biolabs in Mexico. Would have turned out great for everyone says the mick.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124272 posts
Posted on 2/7/24 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

there was a huge risk that NATO was going to attack Russia lol

Putin explained Russian concerns quite logically.

NATO currently conducts war games in Latvia and Estonia along a 300mile border with Russia. During those exercises, nuclear bombers operate 12mi or about 60-90 secs flying time from Russia. Russia in turn must mobilize interceptors. Nuclear bombers are not defensive weapons. NATO flying them near Russia is not a defensive test.

The cost of the NATO exercise is borne by many countries. The cost of the obligatory response is borne by one country -- Russia. Expanding that NATO threat and Russian cost down the entire western Russia-Ukraine/Georgia border is a nonstarter.

Now I have to tell you the Russian position does not seem unreasonable to me. If, as you muse, NATO is not going to attack, what are the repeated offensive weapon exercises about?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram