Started By
Message

re: Jalen Cook is a good player, but

Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:28 pm to
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
3961 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:28 pm to
You really don’t see the difference between when Hannibal runs point vs Cook? He didn’t have a great second half, but every decent offensive possession we had was with him in control.

I was told Cook and Baker were the impact players this year. All Cook and Baker do is throw up quick 3s. Cook is a liability on defense & Baker can’t rebound.

We look better without them, and we definitely get better looks in general when Cook is not on the floor.

Posted by DallasTiger45
Member since May 2012
8458 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

We look better without them, and we definitely get better looks in general when Cook is not on the floor.


I don’t agree that we’re worse with Cook. We desperately need his shotmaking
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
48377 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:33 pm to
I didn’t say Hannibal was bad at all but we saw what happened with him starting last season. He's just too limited on offense to play heavy minutes. The goal is to win no? To win your best players have to be put in the best position to succeed. That’s what hasn’t happened for over a year and a half so far under MM. just saying player X should play because he had a nice stretch the previous game isn’t sustainable.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram