Started By
Message

re: What if the Nazis developed an atomic bomb first?

Posted on 1/27/24 at 1:36 pm to
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
15911 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure what type of bombers Germany had at the time to compare it to the B-29.

They didn't have any. They never built any long range four engined bombers in any quantity. Victor Davis Hanson talks about this in his book The Second World Wars. It was a strategic mistake on the Germans part as it put Russian industry out of their reach after Stalin moved everything to the east.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
91170 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

They never built any long range four engined bombers in any quantity. Victor Davis Hanson talks about this in his book The Second World Wars. It was a strategic mistake on the Germans part as it put Russian industry out of their reach after Stalin moved everything to the east.


I don’t think the Germans ever counted on fighting the U.S. and Russia. Hitlers grave errors were stabbing Stalin in the back when they had an agreement and 2nd error was declaring war on the U.S. after Japan attacked PH. He should have told Japan they’re on their own after that stupidity and tried to keep the U.S. out of Europe as long as possible.


Hitler was determined to conquer mainland Europe and never developed long range bombers or really much of a navy outside of U-boats. He couldn’t even conquer Britain due to it being an island

His power was largely limited to land forces led by his Panzer divisions and a decent short range Luftwaffe. Anytime the Axis powers ventured outside of mainlain Europe (Britain, Russia, North Aftica) they struggled due to lack of a Navy, railroad infrastructure, and long range Air capability. They couldn’t move their land forces and supplies efficiently outside of Europe. One of the smartest things Stalin did was Russia had a different gauge railroad track than Europe used. So Germany’s trains couldn’t get into the USSR without replacing the track. It slowed Hitler down giving Stalin time to move manufacturing to interior Russia
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
50414 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

They didn't have any. They never built any long range four engined bombers in any quantity. Victor Davis Hanson talks about this in his book The Second World Wars.


A four engine "Amerikabomber" was proposed in 1938 and actual plans were produced in early 1942 but they never built the long range, four engine, intercontinental bomber. Was supposed to have a range of 7200 miles.

And yes, it would have been a great asset for them against Russia as well.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram