- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did the state Supreme Court hear the St George case today?
Posted on 1/23/24 at 8:54 pm to NorthEnd
Posted on 1/23/24 at 8:54 pm to NorthEnd
They heard oral arguments. Decisions aren't made the same day arguments are heard. Judge Crain seemed to really drill into the attorney for the City who was claiming that the city would lose over 40% of its revenue from St. George despite not providing any of the services it would have to cut to the St. George area.
1
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:25 pm to kingbob
Genovese and Crichton were silent.
Hughes and Griffin asked a few questions (Griffin nailed BR's counsel about legacy costs).
McCallum asked a few questions, and really hit City of BR attorney with a killshot about St.G. paying for more than they were getting in the last minute of their argument.
Weimer was clearly not leaning to St.G.
Crain took the lead and was all over the BR attorney.
St.G. had two lawyers. First one (Plaisance) made a standing argument that was pretty weak. Second (Bradford) did well and was effective.
Considering the panel was really hammering him, BR attorney (Furr) did about as well as could be expected.
Hughes and Griffin asked a few questions (Griffin nailed BR's counsel about legacy costs).
McCallum asked a few questions, and really hit City of BR attorney with a killshot about St.G. paying for more than they were getting in the last minute of their argument.
Weimer was clearly not leaning to St.G.
Crain took the lead and was all over the BR attorney.
St.G. had two lawyers. First one (Plaisance) made a standing argument that was pretty weak. Second (Bradford) did well and was effective.
Considering the panel was really hammering him, BR attorney (Furr) did about as well as could be expected.
This post was edited on 1/23/24 at 9:33 pm
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News