- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Signee Michael Turner position
Posted on 1/20/24 at 8:57 pm to OJsLifeCoach
Posted on 1/20/24 at 8:57 pm to OJsLifeCoach
quote:
He looks crazy little to try and go up against SEC receivers. I really hope this isn't plan A.
Turner 6-1 170 too small to play in the SEC , Tyrann Mathieu 5-9 175. To be honest I thought he was too small when he committed, I learned a lesson there.
Posted on 1/20/24 at 9:05 pm to Srobi14
Most have Turner at more like 5'11(long arms though) 160 soaking wet. Very similarly sized to Woodland. Doesn't mean they are good or bad just thin/small. I have questions regarding both but you never know what's inside a kid.
Posted on 1/21/24 at 8:23 pm to Srobi14
well 3 of our incoming freshmen in 2024 are all under 170lbs. All are 20 lbs away from being able to play db in the sec.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)