- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pelicans Trade Rumors and Chatter
Posted on 1/24/24 at 7:43 pm to Balsamic_duck
Posted on 1/24/24 at 7:43 pm to Balsamic_duck
quote:
Yeah pass on Caruso, he’s great but what problem is he solving for us?
Both Dyson and Jose are flawed, and one of them is going to be in the rotation, unless you turned one into Caruso or another attainable veteran guard. I personally am not trying to win it all this year, so I would not do a trade like this, but everyone wants to upgrade the center position so I thought it was interesting going the other direction and not without merit. Think back to the season where they turned some fringe NBA player into QPon and peak Norris Cole and instantly went from bad to mediocre. Limiting the minutes of negative players made a big difference for the team.
For the record, I and the advanced stats don't believe Dyson is a negative player. I also like your idea of just targeting Drummond much better. 3rd center is what I've been hoping they upgrade for 2 years because upgrading JV just isn't feasible but supplementing/complementing him is.
Posted on 1/24/24 at 7:51 pm to TigerinATL
Your core players are going to play anywhere between 37-40 minutes a game in the playoffs. That doesn't even include getting Murphy on the court as much as possible. What minimal minutes left will go to the Jose/Dyson/Naji/Hawkins.
If you're trading for someone that you have to give up players and assets for, it better be for someone that will 100% be in the playoff rotation as a substantial contributor.
If you're trading for someone that you have to give up players and assets for, it better be for someone that will 100% be in the playoff rotation as a substantial contributor.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)