Started By
Message

re: Trump’s Boldest Argument Yet: Immunity From Prosecution for Assassinations

Posted on 1/11/24 at 9:28 am to
Posted by lake chuck fan
westlake
Member since Aug 2011
9456 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 9:28 am to
quote:

"But the party CONVICTED"

Impeachment = Indictment by House (essentially, a grand jury)

The Senate conducts the trial and CONVICTS (or acquits).

Thus, only after that process does the person impeached become "the party convicted" and only at that point are they subject to the other processes.


I agree. It states specifically what further action could be taken on the "convicted", but says nothing about the person "not convicted" because there is no further action to be had.
As I stated earlier, the founding fathers never imagined a president impeached but not convicted would ever have to answer the same charge after office. I understand impeachment is not a legal criminal proceeding, but it's the official proceeding used to determine wrong doing of those holding the highest positions of our nation. That should carry enough weight that a reasonable person wouldn't attempt to charge the accused again for that which he was previously "found innocent".
This post was edited on 1/11/24 at 9:32 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425639 posts
Posted on 1/11/24 at 10:07 am to
quote:

I understand impeachment is not a legal criminal proceeding, but it's the official proceeding used to determine wrong doing of those holding the highest positions of our nation.

*for purposes of removal from office
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram