re: Supreme Court agrees to review Trump’s Colorado ballot ban in historic case

quote:

---

Can you point us all to where a second set of valid, legal electors existed for any state? Oh, you can't? Because they didn't? And every state submitted 1 slate of duly appointed electors

---

Irrelevant. The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled the way voting occurred was illegal. Per your standard, when a state Supreme Court makes a factual finding, that is sufficient to make it a fact. Therefore, per your standard, the vote was not conducted legally.

You set the standard. No coming back from it. Take your L.

quote:

---

This is correct, yours knows no bounds.

---

Your ignorance of the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling isn’t a me problem. Facts don’t care about your feelings.