Meh. Moon landing happened way before I existed.

One of the main theories is that because no stars are seen in the footage, it's fake. I don't know shite about what theoretically can or can't be seen from the surface of the moon. So whether it's the gov or conspiracy theorists, I just nod and move along, because it's pointless to argue in either direction about something I know shite about.

Don't get me wrong though, if it was about something I was interested in, then I would be like a lot of people, and argue a side, even if I didn't actually know shite.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by Boss13

Mobile

Member since Oct 2016

1196 posts

Posted on 12/19/23 at 5:09 am to Plx1776

quote:
One of the main theories is that because no stars are seen in the footage, it's fake

The camera couldn't see the stars in the moon landing footage. The astronauts could, but the camera could not because they were too faint in contrast to the surface of the moon which was incredibly bright in relation.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by JackieTreehorn

Malibu

Member since Sep 2013

29297 posts

Posted on 12/19/23 at 2:09 pm to Plx1776

Surely NASA would have thought to add fake stars to the photos they released to the public if they were trying to fool people. They aren’t dummies.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by jackamo3300

New Orleans

Member since Apr 2004

2901 posts

Posted on 12/19/23 at 5:59 pm to Plx1776

quote:
One of the main theories is that because no stars are seen in the footage, it's fake.

Should the normal mind have expected to see "stars" in what were simulations done in a studio by NASA to better explain what was happening since the original videos from the Moon were not very clear.

Somehow some minds might have conflated reality with simulations, with the simulations winning out.

Why the two most minimally charted "new frontiers" remain the Cosmos and the human mind.

0 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board