Started By
Message

re: House across from Walk On's in Zachary

Posted on 12/4/23 at 11:18 pm to
Posted by zippyputt
Member since Jul 2005
5819 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 11:18 pm to
Again, I’ll say it slowly……….I…………never……………..said……………..I ……………..agree……………..with…………………..the………………..decision. In fact, the Kelo decision was horrible. But this was precedent way before Kelo.

That being said, to question the USSC, just study for the LSAT, do well, get accepted to law school, graduate, pass the bar, begin working in constitutional law and get hired by a firm that does USSC cases on takings. Maybe your arguments will change their mind when you get to argue in Washington. Or you could try to get elected to Congress to pass a bill to forbid such takings. Good luck!
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73729 posts
Posted on 12/4/23 at 11:20 pm to
Ok, why was the case brought to Washington?

Before then it was settled and had precident. Why would you question it?

Took someone with means to fight and overturn thar which you are holding so dear now. You said it perfectly. The hill to climb to defeat the developer dollar is too much. You support the whore and support taking private land...even though you act morally superior and oppose it.

Also, still yet to describe the actual public benefit of the roundabout.
This post was edited on 12/4/23 at 11:24 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram