- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So to all the posters who were on the "Trump committed fraud to get his loans" crowd
Posted on 12/1/23 at 12:43 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Posted on 12/1/23 at 12:43 pm to thebigmuffaletta
That's what I don't understand. If the person who the judge is alleging was defrauded testified that they weren't in fact defrauded, then what exactly is the point of contention?
Posted on 12/1/23 at 1:46 pm to RoosterCogburn585
What they are charging Trump with is not Fraud. New York has specific fraud laws and Trump didn’t commit fraud.
This is an example of an intrusive unnecessary law about inflating values. It makes no sense because a thing’s value is only that which an actual buyer is willing to pay.
In real estate offers are made above and below the seller’s price. Often drastically different. Does that make the sellers criminals. Items are auctioned at ridiculous prices compared to what I think they are worth. That some one would pay that much for Dorothy’s shoes is their business.
Murders can destroy a home’s value while a famous connection can bring value. Fixer upper homes in Waco are a prime example.
If hundreds of these cases were being prosecuted in NY, ok. These were highly successful international bankers not little old ladies. This is selected prosecution biased on a law that is wasting space in a law library.
I wonder how much longer it took to dust this one off compared to the Logan act.
This is an example of an intrusive unnecessary law about inflating values. It makes no sense because a thing’s value is only that which an actual buyer is willing to pay.
In real estate offers are made above and below the seller’s price. Often drastically different. Does that make the sellers criminals. Items are auctioned at ridiculous prices compared to what I think they are worth. That some one would pay that much for Dorothy’s shoes is their business.
Murders can destroy a home’s value while a famous connection can bring value. Fixer upper homes in Waco are a prime example.
If hundreds of these cases were being prosecuted in NY, ok. These were highly successful international bankers not little old ladies. This is selected prosecution biased on a law that is wasting space in a law library.
I wonder how much longer it took to dust this one off compared to the Logan act.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News