Started By
Message

re: I’m still irrationally angry about the targeting on Sam

Posted on 11/13/23 at 8:56 am to
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
34129 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 8:56 am to
And it was phoned down from the booth

And the ref stood there at his little monitor and stopped gameplay for 2 minutes with a headset on

Yet we were told the Turner hit was “reviewed” we just didn’t see it? Really?

It’s all a joke at this point. If the intent of Targeting is to make the game safer you can’t make a mockery of it like the SEC has done the last two weeks.
This post was edited on 11/13/23 at 8:57 am
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
19502 posts
Posted on 11/13/23 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

Yet we were told the Turner hit was “reviewed” we just didn’t see it? Really?

Turners’ hit in Daniels was absolutely targeting by the rule. However, we may not have seen them review it on the field because Daniels was down for what felt like 5+ minutes. Sams’ hit didn’t have that downtime.

With that said frick the Bama refs and the SEC. They killed any chance lsu had in that game with their bulkshit non targeting call.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram