- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In Landmark decision, Jury Finds Realtors Conspired to inflate Commissions|$1.8 B verdict
Posted on 10/31/23 at 8:11 pm to rmc
Posted on 10/31/23 at 8:11 pm to rmc
quote:
Find me a state law from any state that says if you buy real estate an attorney is required. I’ll wait.
South Carolina, State v. Buyers Service Co., 357 S.E.2d 15 (S.C. 1986.)
Posted on 10/31/23 at 8:16 pm to Centinel
quote:
South Carolina, State v. Buyers Service Co., 357 S.E.2d 15 (S.C. 1986.)
Lol that shits wild. I’ll stand corrected if that’s still good case law. SC bar association apparently has a stiff lobby. I cede the point.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)