Started By
Message

re: Why isn't Kelly getting more criticism for end of game clock management?

Posted on 9/24/23 at 12:54 pm to
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56517 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

We threw on 2nd to last play bc there were 1- seconds on the clock
correct. To run seconds off. Three exact.

What is the issue, I thought we wanted less time in it fir Arky.

Should we have run it? Kicked in 3 w no timeouts left.

Or throw it away and take a few seconds off

What was you choice?
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67593 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 12:57 pm to
We should have managed the clock better and had a TO to use after 3rd down. In a way I’m shocked so many on here are not understanding how bad the clock management was. We called a TO before first down with 1:44 on the clock and had 2 left. If we don’t call a TO after 1st and 2nd down we have one to use with 3 seconds left. It isn’t rocket science.-
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
14936 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 1:01 pm to
You serious my man?

The issue is using our final time out for no fricking reason. The stupid part was calling a time out. This is really simple like scary simple.

First and goal arky has no time outs and there is enough play clock time that if done correctly arky never gets that ball back.

The time out after the first down play was fine, except what we did after. We should have ran to the middle or kneeled if.

Then we don’t call a time out after the 2nd down and you kneel on third and down and call time out with 2 seconds left and kick it.

This shouldn’t be hard at all LSU had the ability to run every second down and we didn’t because of piss poor management.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram