Started By
Message

re: September 18-20, 1863 - The Battle of Chickamauga | 160th Anniversary

Posted on 9/19/23 at 8:06 am to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
65129 posts
Posted on 9/19/23 at 8:06 am to
quote:

The butcher's bill was appalling:

Confederate
2,312 killed
14,674 wounded
1,468 captured or missing

Union
1,657 killed
9,756 wounded
4,757 captured or missing


Seeing these casualty figures really illustrates the leaps and bounds military technology took in such a short span of time between the American Civil War and WWI. For perspective, the timespan between these two wars was roughly the same amount of time between the Vietnam War and the later stages of the War on Terror, in the ballpark of 50 years. But the advances in technology between 1863 and 1914 meant such a battle as Chickamauga came with casualties ten times (or more) as high in 1914. What’s sad about all this is that that while technology advanced by leaps and bounds, infantry tactics did not. Soldiers attacked in virtually the same way in 1914 as they did in 1863.
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
12777 posts
Posted on 9/19/23 at 9:08 am to
quote:

What’s sad about all this is that that while technology advanced by leaps and bounds, infantry tactics did not. Soldiers attacked in virtually the same way in 1914 as they did in 1863.

Really the same thing can be said about the tactics during the Civil War. Technology had advanced to include rifled barrels and repeating rifles which gave greater rates of fire and more accurate fire at greater distances, but massed infantry still lined up and marched shoulder to shoulder across a field firing like they did during the Revolution or in Napoleon's time.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram