quote:
What you believe is ridiculous and is worthy of ridicule. And if archaeologists find Sodom, and confirm it was destroyed by fire or lava, it still won’t be evidence of divine intervention.

Blah Blah Blah! Attempting to muddy the waters with senseless arguments,eh?

If archaeologists find Sodom (which their evidence shows they have) and collect evidence that it was destroyed by fire or lava (which their evidence shows was destroyed by a fire from the sky - not by lava) then it only confirms the account given in Genesis 18.

Me thinks you're attempt to separate this archeological find from the biblical account recorded in Genesis 18. You know muddy the waters with all kinds of tricks with names.

In the future, before you launch into a full volley of every sort of name for God please actually read the account of the destruction of Sodom & Gomorrah in the Bible. The Archeologist (and Author) is also a Biblical Scholar. I'll let him filter through the names and make the connection between Biblical Account (Genesis 18) and his findings on the ground. I'll pass on your attempt to dazzle TD readers with your tongue twisting quasi-expertise at God naming. Fair enough?

Good evening heathen. Nice try.

This post was edited on 9/9/23 at 3:49 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Squirrelmeister

Member since Nov 2021

1874 posts

Posted on 9/9/23 at 9:11 pm to Zarkinletch416

So you acknowledge the righteous Lot offered his two daughters to a crowd to be gang raped?

ETA:

Let me help you out from Genesis 19:

quote:
4But before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both young and old, all the people to the last man, surrounded the house. 5And they called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us, that we may know them.” 6Lot went out to the men at the entrance, shut the door after him, 7and said, “I beg you, my brothers, do not act so wickedly. 8Behold, I have two daughters who have not known any man. Let me bring them out to you, and do to them as you please. Only do nothing to these men, for they have come under the shelter of my roof.”

Lot lied to the mob - his daughters had known men (their husbands, Lot’s sons-in-law). Lot offered them up to the mob to be raped.

Do you understand now why the sons-in-law no longer trusted Lot? What I don’t understand is why the daughters didn’t leave Lot with their husbands, after all, wives were literally property of their husbands.

This post was edited on 9/10/23 at 7:17 am

9 ...

Report Post

Posted by Azkiger

Member since Nov 2016

21816 posts

Posted on 9/10/23 at 9:48 am to Zarkinletch416