Not understanding the problem here - besides the pettiness of most J-6 related "justice,"
but I don't see how the private company is in any position to question the validity of the warrant.

If the warrant is properly prepared and presented, then the problem is with the judicial system and not the private company.

Of course, anything related to J-6 is probably tainted - but the company probably doesn't even know the genesis of the warrant.

Go to the mat demanding the Justice system get their act together, but cannot fault the company on this one - just my humble opinion here.

3 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by memphisplaya

Member since Jan 2009

86118 posts

Posted on 9/6/23 at 12:40 am to ChineseBandit58

quote:
private company is in any position to question the validity of the warrant.

They absolutely can tell the FBI to pound sand. The Safe in question most likely was not named in the warrant and the FBI most likely used deception to get access.

This post was edited on 9/6/23 at 12:41 am

2 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by La Place Mike

West Florida Republic

Member since Jan 2004

29284 posts

Posted on 9/6/23 at 6:24 am to ChineseBandit58

quote:
If the warrant is properly prepared and presented, then the problem is with the judicial system and not the private company.

The private company no longer owns the safe. Why should it have access?

0 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Posted by Proximo

Member since Aug 2011

17155 posts

Posted on 9/6/23 at 6:50 am to ChineseBandit58

quote:
If the warrant is properly prepared and presented

Oh really. Did you forget about the PC affidavits submitted to the FISA court to get the warrants to spy on Trump?

I bet you believe those were properly prepared because a judge signed off on them

Hey, it got a signature! There’s your judicial system, clown

0 Jump to Post ...

Report Post Jump to Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board