- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
This is how far better the SEC is than the Pac-10
Posted on 11/26/08 at 9:37 pm
Posted on 11/26/08 at 9:37 pm
According to my computer ratings.....
0.54426
0.49318
0.52233
0.55902
Pac-10 average: .49318
SEC average: .55902
Pac-10 without Washington and Washington State: .54426
SEC without Florida and Alabama: .52233
The SEC is better than the Pac-10 even without its two best schools!
The Pac-10 is worse than the SEC even without its two worst schools!
@ the Pac-10.
0.54426
0.49318
0.52233
0.55902
Pac-10 average: .49318
SEC average: .55902
Pac-10 without Washington and Washington State: .54426
SEC without Florida and Alabama: .52233
The SEC is better than the Pac-10 even without its two best schools!
The Pac-10 is worse than the SEC even without its two worst schools!
@ the Pac-10.
2
Posted on 11/26/08 at 9:55 pm to xiv
quote:
The SEC is better than the Pac-10 even without its two best schools! The Pac-10 is worse than the SEC even without its two worst schools!
but when you combine these two...
Posted on 11/26/08 at 10:00 pm to DollaChoppa
Yes, they are horribe we know. What are they without USC?
Posted on 11/26/08 at 10:59 pm to DollaChoppa
quote:Yeah, the Pac-10 without UW/WSU is better than the SEC without Bama/UF.
but when you combine these two...
Posted on 11/26/08 at 11:13 pm to xiv
MJRuffalo's douche bag self in
3.....2.....
3.....2.....
Posted on 11/26/08 at 11:23 pm to xiv
Yet somehow the PAC-10 owns the SEC over the past several years. Go figure. Must be embarassing.
This post was edited on 11/26/08 at 11:32 pm
Posted on 11/27/08 at 12:18 am to LSUTANGERINE
Not really.
This post was edited on 11/27/08 at 12:31 am
Posted on 11/27/08 at 12:22 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Yet somehow the PAC-10 owns the SEC over the past several years. Go figure. Must be embarassing.
How many National Championships does the SEC have in the past two years? Now how many does the Pac 10 have?
Posted on 11/27/08 at 12:23 am to Mathias
quote:
Yes, they are horribe we know. What are they without USC?
da MAC
Posted on 11/27/08 at 12:24 am to GoldenBoy
quote:
How many National Championships does the SEC have in the past two years? Now how many does the Pac 10 have?
and pushing for a 3rd....
Posted on 11/27/08 at 7:32 am to Jrv2damac
quote:
Not really.
Yes, really.
Posted on 11/27/08 at 7:33 am to Jrv2damac
quote:
and pushing for a 3rd....
I think you mean a 4th. Yet somehow the PAC10 still beats up on the SEC like a red-headed stepchild.
Posted on 11/27/08 at 10:22 am to LSUTANGERINE
How many of those head to head wins were by the condoms though? Played Ar Kansas, what, twice without McFadden? And as we all can see, UTe is a shell of its former self...
Posted on 11/27/08 at 10:36 am to Icansee4miles
quote:One of my favorite myths.
Played Ar Kansas, what, twice without McFadden?
McFadden was a true Freshman when we dropped 70 on our bacon buddies in Los Angeles, and he was their leading rusher (albeit with a sore toe cause he kicked himself to the curb) the next year in Fayetteville.
We only scored 50 something on the SEC West leaders at home.
Posted on 11/27/08 at 11:11 am to loweralabamatrojan
I guess if the PAC-10 would have loaded up on Mac, Sun belt, Conf. usa and 1AA teams then we would score much higher in this very flawed computer system.
All I know is that this guys computer system has Texas Tech rated higher than Oklahoma. That should be enough info about how valid it is.
All I know is that this guys computer system has Texas Tech rated higher than Oklahoma. That should be enough info about how valid it is.
Posted on 11/27/08 at 4:44 pm to Mathias
they have USC and thats it. the pac 10 blows.
Posted on 11/27/08 at 4:52 pm to lsusportsman2
quote:If you combined the SEC and Pac-10 right now, how would you rank them?
they have USC and thats it. the pac 10 blows.
My computer says:
1. Alabama
2. Florida
3. Southern California
4. Georgia
5. Oregon State
6. Mississippi
7. Oregon
8. California
9. Louisiana State
10. South Carolina
11. Vanderbilt
12. Kentucky
13. Arizona
14. Stanford
15. Auburn
16. UCLA
17. Tennessee
18. Arkansas
19. Arizona State
20. Mississippi State
21. Washington State
22. Washington
Posted on 11/27/08 at 4:57 pm to xiv
i think ole miss is better than oregon state, but other than that, i agree.
Posted on 11/27/08 at 10:32 pm to MJRuffalo
quote:
I guess if the PAC-10 would have loaded up on Mac, Sun belt, Conf. usa and 1AA teams then we would score much higher in this very flawed computer system
Just stay the Hell away from those juggernaut Mountain West teams-I think the final tally for 2008 was MW-6 wins, Pac Little 9-1 win...
Posted on 11/27/08 at 10:39 pm to Icansee4miles
quote:
Just stay the Hell away from those juggernaut Mountain West teams-I think the final tally for 2008 was MW-6 wins, Pac Little 9-1 win...
Page 1 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News