re: Federal judge rejects bids to halt Georgia prosecution of Trump aides over 2020 election

As is the norm here, you are screeching about a judicial ruling interpreting a statute, without bothering to read the statute:

quote:

---

28 USC §1442(a)

A ... criminal prosecution ... commenced in a State court ... against ... any of the following may be removed by them to the district court of the United States ...:

(1)The United States or any agency thereof or any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States or of any agency thereof, in an official or individual capacity, for or relating to any act under color of such office or on account of any right, title or authority claimed under any Act of Congress for the apprehension or punishment of criminals or the collection of the revenue.

...

(3)Any officer of the courts of the United States, for or relating to any act under color of office or in the performance of his duties ....

---

The parties seeking removal are arguing that the state proceeding should be stayed, pending determination of that issue by the federal judge. So, let's take a look at the statute governing the procedures for removal:

quote:

---

28 USC §1455(b)(3)
The filing of a notice of removal ... shall not prevent the State court ... from proceeding further, except that a judgment of conviction shall not be entered unless the prosecution is first remanded.

---

How could the relevant statute be MORE clear on the issue of a stay?

BTW, here is the Order, which you also failed to include.