- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: No matter what about (man influenced) climate change, those claiming it are always right.
Posted on 8/22/23 at 5:04 pm to Korkstand
Posted on 8/22/23 at 5:04 pm to Korkstand
Even if we stopped burning all fossil fuels right now there would be very little difference in sea levels in 100 years compared to gradually changing to clean energy as we develop the technology.
And certainly it would be much more detrimental both financial cost and cost to human life if we forced abrupt change to how much energy we can produce. That’s just a ludicrous assessment that it would be more expensive to adapt to rising sea levels vs the cost of a drastic decrease in energy supply.
And certainly it would be much more detrimental both financial cost and cost to human life if we forced abrupt change to how much energy we can produce. That’s just a ludicrous assessment that it would be more expensive to adapt to rising sea levels vs the cost of a drastic decrease in energy supply.
1
Posted on 8/22/23 at 5:09 pm to jyoung1
quote:
Even if we stopped burning all fossil fuels right now there would be very little difference in sea levels in 100 years compared to gradually changing to clean energy as we develop the technology.
Can you show your work? And how far along in clean energy tech do you think we would be right now without incentives?
quote:
And certainly it would be much more detrimental both financial cost and cost to human life if we forced abrupt change to how much energy we can produce. That’s just a ludicrous assessment that it would be more expensive to adapt to rising sea levels vs the cost of a drastic decrease in energy supply.
Not sure what you are talking about re energy supply and production.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News