- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: California votes AGAINST making the human trafficking of a minor a serious felony...
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:09 pm to RollTide1987
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:09 pm to RollTide1987
If it passed and was supported by both parties why would a committee have the authority to deny?
What elected official would vote no, knowing his vote would be public knowledge? How would you justify that to your voter base? These are the type of things I could understand people demonstrating or rioting over, not protecting children.
What elected official would vote no, knowing his vote would be public knowledge? How would you justify that to your voter base? These are the type of things I could understand people demonstrating or rioting over, not protecting children.
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:13 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:apparently, you did not read the article.
If it passed and was supported by both parties why would a committee have the authority to deny?
It passed in the Senate. After a bill passes the senate, Schoolhouse Rock tells us that it then goes to the lower chamber (called the “assembly“ in California).
In the lower chamber, it again goes through committee, before it again goes to the floor. For whatever reason, the bill was temporarily killed in committee in that second chamber. The bill is still subject to reconsideration.
To be clear, the trafficking in question is already a felony under California law. What this bill would have done is add trafficking (not a capital felony) to a list of capital felonies for purposes of the California recidivism law. (That is a somewhat simplified explanation.)
it is entirely possible that someone looked at this legislation and said “trafficking is really bad, but it’s not nearly as bad as murder.“
This post was edited on 7/11/23 at 3:27 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News