Started By
Message

re: California votes AGAINST making the human trafficking of a minor a serious felony...

Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:09 pm to
Posted by lake chuck fan
westlake
Member since Aug 2011
9510 posts
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:09 pm to
If it passed and was supported by both parties why would a committee have the authority to deny?

What elected official would vote no, knowing his vote would be public knowledge? How would you justify that to your voter base? These are the type of things I could understand people demonstrating or rioting over, not protecting children.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/11/23 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

If it passed and was supported by both parties why would a committee have the authority to deny?
apparently, you did not read the article.

It passed in the Senate. After a bill passes the senate, Schoolhouse Rock tells us that it then goes to the lower chamber (called the “assembly“ in California).

In the lower chamber, it again goes through committee, before it again goes to the floor. For whatever reason, the bill was temporarily killed in committee in that second chamber. The bill is still subject to reconsideration.

To be clear, the trafficking in question is already a felony under California law. What this bill would have done is add trafficking (not a capital felony) to a list of capital felonies for purposes of the California recidivism law. (That is a somewhat simplified explanation.)

it is entirely possible that someone looked at this legislation and said “trafficking is really bad, but it’s not nearly as bad as murder.“
This post was edited on 7/11/23 at 3:27 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram