Started By
Message

re: CNN has the recording.

Posted on 6/28/23 at 9:32 am to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48962 posts
Posted on 6/28/23 at 9:32 am to
quote:

That's absurd. Your argument is that someone can confess to a "crime" on tape, then throw away the evidence, and they can't be prosecuted.


Nonsense. Prove beyond a reasonable doubt it wasn’t his usual puffery without the document. Of course they need the document. Without it there is no way that tape rises to level of proving anything beyond a reasonable doubt.

This post was edited on 6/28/23 at 9:35 am
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116841 posts
Posted on 6/28/23 at 9:34 am to
Of course they do not.

Witnesses could testify to the nature of the documents if they actually saw them. There are a variety of other ways to corroborate, and a taped "confession" certainly rarely HELPS a defendant.

If they didn't actually see the document, yes that is an issue on this one singular count.

But again: They are almost certainly using the audio as a framing device for the rest of his "crimes", the 36 other counts he is being charged with.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram