Started By
Message

re: Titanic tourist submarine goes missing

Posted on 6/29/23 at 2:36 pm to
Posted by SpartanSoul
Member since Aug 2016
887 posts
Posted on 6/29/23 at 2:36 pm to
I'm guessing the landing skid wasn't designed to absorb an impact since he figured it would never come to that because of the "genius design".

I doubt the subs terminal velocity was very high if it did impact the bottom intact but it was pretty heavy even in water and the carbon fiber was already at it's limits at that depth so it probably wouldn't have taken much to cause the implosion.

The multiple failures needed for this scenario would be the worst case for the occupants. They would have known and it would have been agonizing for the father looking at his son.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101931 posts
Posted on 7/3/23 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

I'm guessing the landing skid wasn't designed to absorb an impact since he figured it would never come to that because of the "genius design".


If we're being real, designing the thing to resist a significant impact at 12,000' down is almost certainly cost prohibitive right from the start. Just like you can't design a plane to survive an impact with a mountain.

Okay, not that extreme, but not that far off either considering the pressure at that depth.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram