Vulnerabilities?

An admirable euphemism.

Whoever wrote that is a master of the understatement.

Almost makes Dominion seem rather innocent and in no way conspiratorial, or were absolutely conscious and aware of these "vulnerabilities" during the development phase.

What in-depth investigations will it take to show that these "vulnerabilities" were not inadvertent and innocent at all, but intended with full malice aforethought.

So more evidence that it wasn't just hard copy mail-in ballots.

For many it must be easier to grasp and accept items one can see and feel rather than slick software irregularities, which seem so "conspiratorial," so abstract and "out there" somewhere in the firmament.

Still have to dive into forensics of what roles were played in the shuck by Diebold, Solar Winds, Dominion and its derivative Smartmatics, the C.I.A. originated Hammer and its complement Scorecard.

Or how about Leonardo over there in Italy - so far away, so removed.

Is the immensity of what this would take the reason that courts would rather avoid, because of where it would lead, and what chaos and loss of confidence it would cause among the populace toward their Republic. Well, it already has.

Now we learn that new arriving Dominion machines - the most recent batch ordered for us by Ardoin - will have modems.

What could possibly go wrong. Will modems for voting machines that are promoted as secure, might one day be labeled as "irregularities?"

81 million votes? Not hardly.

Way too many to even have been done with mail-in ballots (many unsolicited), vote harvesting, and making use of multiple thousands of illegitimate names on rolls, as we have here in Orleans that are in place and ready for use in upcoming elections.

All that physical trouble and effort to have to go through when so much of it can be done electronically.

Maybe our "retiring" Ardoin will merit a well-deserved position that has been readied for him on the staff of Dominion.