- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Supreme Court rules in favor of Black voters in Alabama redistricting case
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:59 am to teke184
Posted on 6/8/23 at 9:59 am to teke184
quote:
They couldn’t make a second one in the 90s without making Cleo Fields into Zorro, representing from Shreveport to Monroe to Baker to Bogalusa.
Yep. And prior SCOTUS decisions have ruled against such gerrymandering.
It’s a problem without a solution UNLESS you stop dividing people by race.
That’s the final and obvious choice that must be made. But we’re going in the wrong direction, currently.
1
Posted on 6/8/23 at 10:03 am to Jimbeaux
As usual, Thomas is on point in his dissent.
Either Section 2 of the VRA doesn't require this, or if it does, it's unconstitutional.
But, why let that get in the way?
fricking Roberts and Kavanaugh.
Either Section 2 of the VRA doesn't require this, or if it does, it's unconstitutional.
But, why let that get in the way?
fricking Roberts and Kavanaugh.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News