Started By
Message

re: The Curious Case of Natalia Grace

Posted on 5/31/23 at 10:22 pm to
Posted by Festus
With Skillet
Member since Nov 2009
85067 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 10:22 pm to
Well, they found the birth mother in Ukraine, took her DNA, proved she was the mother. She says she was born in 2003. Also, MD has her X-rays that show her “plates hadn’t opened”, meaning scientifically she was a child when she was re-aged.

No question, she was a child. But judge ruled her age cannot be brought into evidence even though judge mistakenly re aged her. This is insanity.
Posted by nvasil1
Hellinois
Member since Oct 2009
15970 posts
Posted on 5/31/23 at 10:54 pm to
Yeah the court ruling that the jury couldn't be told her actual age was peak stupidity.

Pretty fascinating that Michael never once said he loved Natalia or got emotional when alleging his ex-wife beat the shite out of her. Yet he cried instantly when talking about his sons, claiming the ex-wife mentally abused him, or when the trial was over. Everything was about him.

Seems like this couple were narcissistic pieces of shite whose adopted disabled daughter became too much of an inconvenience for them. And when their marriage went south, they tried to deflect blame on one another.
This post was edited on 5/31/23 at 10:56 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram