- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: You wouldn’t believe what the most dangerous breed of dog was
Posted on 4/12/23 at 1:30 pm to RedRifle
Posted on 4/12/23 at 1:30 pm to RedRifle
first of all that data is over 12 years old.
secondly, what does the data even mean?
what is 2500?
oh and i'd prefer if pit bulls were extinct, before you dumbasses attack me thinking i'm trying to defend them simply by stating i don't understand how to read this ancient data.
secondly, what does the data even mean?
what is 2500?
oh and i'd prefer if pit bulls were extinct, before you dumbasses attack me thinking i'm trying to defend them simply by stating i don't understand how to read this ancient data.
Posted on 3/11/24 at 10:36 am to TeddyPadillac
quote:First, do you think the data on dog attacks have changed that much in 12 years?
first of all that data is over 12 years old.
secondly, what does the data even mean?
what is 2500?
Secondly, read the caption: relative risk of fatal attack by dog. A Pit Bull attack is 2500x as likely to be fatal as the average dog attack.
ETA: Data is a plural noun BTW. Datum is the singular form.
This post was edited on 3/11/24 at 4:29 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)