- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: They’re Going After Justice Clarence Thomas Now (Again)
Posted on 4/6/23 at 10:46 am to imjustafatkid
Posted on 4/6/23 at 10:46 am to imjustafatkid
Lol Just because you keep saying it doesn’t make it so.
The issue is alleged ethics violations. If you don’t know what an ethics violation is, google is your friend.
The issue is alleged ethics violations. If you don’t know what an ethics violation is, google is your friend.
2
Posted on 4/6/23 at 10:46 am to mwade91383
quote:
The issue is alleged ethics violations. If you don’t know what an ethics violation is, google is your friend.
Yes, it's a minor ethics violation. I stated as much already. It isn't more than that. Certainly doesn't even come anywhere close to the level of impeachment.
This post was edited on 4/6/23 at 10:47 am
Posted on 4/6/23 at 10:51 am to mwade91383
quote:
The issue is alleged ethics violations. If you don’t know what an ethics violation is, google is your friend.
Literally the first story linked in the OP's article
Supreme Court Justices Don't Have An Ethics Code
How is it a violation of the ethics code they don't have?
I agree that they should. But if they don't have an ethics code, they can't be violating it.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News