Started By
Message

re: The takes on board is nuts . . .

Posted on 3/31/23 at 1:02 pm to
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
18069 posts
Posted on 3/31/23 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Has anyone else stepped up to tell us they are more committed to taking "them" on at this point?

I don't see how this is relevant to the point. All I'm saying is "Trump was fricked over by _______ (fill in blank) is more an acknowledgement of ineffectiveness than an excuse given it happened all the time.

As for being committed to taking "them" on, I'm not persuaded by those words. I'm not sure there's anybody better, but we have DT's first term to put "taking them on" in perspective.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101727 posts
Posted on 3/31/23 at 1:06 pm to
Seems pretty simple. The blank based on the discussion is:
quote:

RINOS fricked him? ryan and mccain?

Who has stepped up more to say they are committed to countering those in the party who are pushing it similar to the way those individuals were?

I get it. You must not think Trump was effective in doing so, but he said it, he tried some as best I can tell, and is saying he will continue it. But is that better or worse than those who aren't even saying they want to do such a thing?

I don't know. I'd rather the guy at least saying it, though, all other things being equal.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram