Started By
Message

re: Russia taking 70 year old t-54/55 out of storage to the front

Posted on 3/26/23 at 11:45 am to
Posted by tigerfan 64
in the LP
Member since Sep 2016
3992 posts
Posted on 3/26/23 at 11:45 am to
quote:

I doubt many of them will run much less be combat ready.

Do they have ammo/shells for 70 year old tanks?
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
20049 posts
Posted on 3/26/23 at 7:44 pm to
There are quite a few of them still in service in the 3rd world.

quote:


Do they have ammo/shells for 70 year old tanks?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-54/T-55

quote:

The T-54 and T-55 tanks are a series of Soviet main battle tanks introduced in the years following the Second World War. The first T-54 prototype was completed at Nizhny Tagil by the end of 1945.[3] From the late 1950s, the T-54 eventually became the main tank for armoured units of the Soviet Army, armies of the Warsaw Pact countries, and many others. T-54s and T-55s have been involved in many of the world's armed conflicts since their introduction in the second half of the 20th century.

The T-54/55 series is the most-produced tank in history. Estimated production numbers for the series range from 96,500 to 100,000. They were replaced by the T-62, T-64, T-72, T-80 and T-90 tanks in the Soviet and Russian armies, but remain in use by up to 50 other armies worldwide, some having received sophisticated retrofitting.


quote:

Extensive postwar investigations have suggested that the most crucial factor to win an armor battle is not the lethality of your cannon nor the thickness of your armor, but rather who spotted first and fired first. In this sense the Bradley enjoys an unarguable advantage with its day TV and direct view optics, automatic dual target tracking and two-axis stabilized head mirror. This holds especially true when its comes to night combat. Yes, late-war American and German tanks have some sorts of infrared night vision, but they were very primitive and by no means comparable to modern thermal imaging optics. In fact, WWII-era active IR searchlights will only make themselves more conspicuous on passive IR images.

This is interesting:

https://www.quora.com/M2-Bradley-vs-WW2-Tank-which-one-would-win

Bradley also outranges WWII tanks. WWII tanks lack means of rangefinding and have low first-shot accuracy. They can’t effectively engage targets on the move either due to lack of gun stabilization and computerized fire-control (Even the M4 Sherman, one of the first tanks to equip gyro-stabilizers require a short halt to fire). The average WWII tank battle distance is about 770 meters. The Bradley, on the other side, can reliably engage targets up to 3750 m with its TOW missile, which not a single WWII tank can withstand. It can also fire its 25 mm Bushmaster autocannon on the move with accuracy, a feature WWII tanks can only dream of.


Interestingly, America has produced over 2,900 Bradleys.
This post was edited on 3/26/23 at 8:10 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram