Started By
Message

re: LIV Ratings

Posted on 3/1/23 at 2:30 pm to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49050 posts
Posted on 3/1/23 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

The bartender split my $10 bill into two $5s. I’m pumped to have more money” Or, splitting a foursome into two 2 somes and being pumped about more golf Dawg or someone else, am I off base here?


The problem with his analogy is he is using examples with finite numbers. There is not a finite amount of professional golfers. If 48 players play in a LIV event, the field sizes in PGA and KF don’t get smaller. Young, talented players fill in those 48 spots. Which means more golf. That is just a fact.


He should be arguing quality of golf would decrease. Then we could have an argument about whether that is true. To say it isn’t more golf is just untrue. Even funnier he thinks stating a fact is “dumb”.
This post was edited on 3/1/23 at 2:48 pm
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
42839 posts
Posted on 3/1/23 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

If 48 players play in a LIV event, the field sizes in PGA and KF don’t get smaller. Young, talented players fill in those 48 spots. Which means more golf. That is just a fact.


I got ya. And I’m with you. I like watching all the golf I can get. A very unhealthy amt.

Amateur tourneys, LPGA, KFT, etc.

I just don’t love LIV for the reason that it minimizes the best players all playing at the same time. Don’t get me wrong, I do think it helped the PGA Tour some because it was a little stagnant and asleep at the wheel. I just wish changes could have been made with no LIV.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram