- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pfizer immunity legal research project - on how to avoid
Posted on 2/2/23 at 4:56 pm to idsrdum
Posted on 2/2/23 at 4:56 pm to idsrdum
This is interesting. The PREP Act appears to have applied to Treatments. Are the "vaccines" considered "treatments"
Moreover, there are exceptions for fraud and development for ill purpose, which, BTW that Project Veritas video gives some pretty compelling evidence about . . . Pfzier doesn't need to be worried about cops, but may need to worry about some mass consumer class action.
Plus, the vaccine injury fund law doesn't define the word vaccine. The only definition I could find is in the freaking tax code: "Vaccine.--The term “vaccine” means any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of 1 or more diseases."
26 U.S.C.A. § 4132 (West)
A vaccine, is a vaccine, if the Secretary of Health and Human Services says it is. There are no criteria either in the statute itself or in the Code of Federal Regulations that tell us how something qualifies for a vaccine.
Y'all some lawyer somewhere could have a field day with this. Wednesday, esq. does not have that kind of resources, but there is very shaky legal basis for this "immunity" that Pfizer thinks it has.
It only exists bc Pfizer as a practical matter controls the people that work for the Health and Human Services, and the Deep State actually runs the government.
I have to go to lie down bc 45 minutes of research has given me some vapors
Moreover, there are exceptions for fraud and development for ill purpose, which, BTW that Project Veritas video gives some pretty compelling evidence about . . . Pfzier doesn't need to be worried about cops, but may need to worry about some mass consumer class action.
Plus, the vaccine injury fund law doesn't define the word vaccine. The only definition I could find is in the freaking tax code: "Vaccine.--The term “vaccine” means any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of 1 or more diseases."
26 U.S.C.A. § 4132 (West)
A vaccine, is a vaccine, if the Secretary of Health and Human Services says it is. There are no criteria either in the statute itself or in the Code of Federal Regulations that tell us how something qualifies for a vaccine.
Y'all some lawyer somewhere could have a field day with this. Wednesday, esq. does not have that kind of resources, but there is very shaky legal basis for this "immunity" that Pfizer thinks it has.
It only exists bc Pfizer as a practical matter controls the people that work for the Health and Human Services, and the Deep State actually runs the government.
I have to go to lie down bc 45 minutes of research has given me some vapors
2
Posted on 2/2/23 at 6:52 pm to Wednesday
kinda like the talcum powder J&J mess. Asbestos is a form of silica, Silica makes up about half of the mass of earth. There is no sample of naturally occurring earth that does not contain asbestos. { actually had a congress critter get involved in a Kuwait project over this topic}
The covid shot folks just need to get the ill effects in front of a jury that is not capable of understanding the relation between correlation and causation.
Posted on 2/2/23 at 7:43 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Are the "vaccines" considered "treatments"
According to the link they are medical countermeasures which includes vaccines.
quote:
the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) authorizes the
Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to limit legal liability for losses relating to the
administration of medical countermeasures such as diagnostics, treatments, and vaccines.
Regarding Covid vaccine injury, because these vaccines, or medical countermeasures, are authorized by the PREP act they would fall under the CICP rather than the VICP. LINK comparing the two.
quote:
very shaky legal basis for this "immunity" that Pfizer thinks it has
Check out what this article reports Pfizer used as its defense against a whistleblower. Couldn't find source documents for Pfizer's statement but maybe you can.
quote:
In its motion to dismiss, Pfizer says the regulations don’t apply to its vaccine contract with the U.S. Department of Defense because the agreement was executed under the department’s Other Transaction Authority (OTA), which gives contract holders the ability to skirt many rules and laws that typically apply to contracts.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News