- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dale Brown Court Controversy
Posted on 2/8/23 at 9:30 am to el gato
Posted on 2/8/23 at 9:30 am to el gato
quote:
The problem with your analogy is that Gunter is as qualified as Brown.
So stupid. It is not about who is qualified. It is about the fact that it was voted down and still being pushed through by someone who wants it. If the board thought Gunter was deserving they would have voted it through. The George Floyd example is extreme but it basically means ones persons agenda can supercede the voting process and be pushed through.
quote:
If Brown is so insulted that LSU would have him share the naming of LSU's court with Gunter then perhaps he should ask the school to remove his name.
This will probably happen and will be an extreme embarrassment to LSU and will be all over every sports publication everywhere. Unnecessarily. Dale will be interviewed evrywhere to combat the fact that he is made out to be sexist and Mary Werner will be in the media hailed as a Democrat party hero, which is I am sure her goal ultimately. The whole thing will be another LSU black eye.
Posted on 2/8/23 at 9:44 am to adamb2151
There isn’t much difference in Collis Temple running to Tate the second he was named president to leverage him to help get Dales name on the court.
Politics was used then and it was fine. Now she’s doing it and it’s a problem. So what if they’ve already voted. Can they not look at an issue twice? Maybe the board wants to hold another vote. Is it no longer allowed.
Politics was used then and it was fine. Now she’s doing it and it’s a problem. So what if they’ve already voted. Can they not look at an issue twice? Maybe the board wants to hold another vote. Is it no longer allowed.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News