Started By
Message

re: Dale Brown Court Controversy

Posted on 2/8/23 at 9:30 am to
Posted by adamb2151
Houston, Texas
Member since Jun 2013
6586 posts
Posted on 2/8/23 at 9:30 am to
quote:

The problem with your analogy is that Gunter is as qualified as Brown.


So stupid. It is not about who is qualified. It is about the fact that it was voted down and still being pushed through by someone who wants it. If the board thought Gunter was deserving they would have voted it through. The George Floyd example is extreme but it basically means ones persons agenda can supercede the voting process and be pushed through.


quote:

If Brown is so insulted that LSU would have him share the naming of LSU's court with Gunter then perhaps he should ask the school to remove his name.


This will probably happen and will be an extreme embarrassment to LSU and will be all over every sports publication everywhere. Unnecessarily. Dale will be interviewed evrywhere to combat the fact that he is made out to be sexist and Mary Werner will be in the media hailed as a Democrat party hero, which is I am sure her goal ultimately. The whole thing will be another LSU black eye.
Posted by HighRoller
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2011
4303 posts
Posted on 2/8/23 at 9:44 am to
There isn’t much difference in Collis Temple running to Tate the second he was named president to leverage him to help get Dales name on the court.

Politics was used then and it was fine. Now she’s doing it and it’s a problem. So what if they’ve already voted. Can they not look at an issue twice? Maybe the board wants to hold another vote. Is it no longer allowed.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram